Unit 1

Back to Home Print This Page Email This Page
Bargaining Central 

State to EDD workers: ‘Eat more carrots’


Updated 4:45 p.m., July 23

State negotiators said Tuesday that over-worked employees simply need to “do more exercise and eat more carrots” to avoid stress from overtime at Employment Development Department (EDD) call centers.

State negotiators, who will not address our economic issues until the Legislature and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger agree on the budget, spent a day of bargaining disrespecting the workload concerns of our Informational, Financial and Public Resource Professionals (Unit 1).

State listens but doesn’t move on money
Updated 11:30 a.m., July 22

A state negotiator said Monday that while she appreciates listening to our workers testify about pay inequities she will not agree to salary increases due to the $15 billion budget deficit.

Debbie True of the Department of Personnel Administration said testimony from members “was invaluable” and a “real eye opener.” But she was not impressed enough to agree to increasing certain salaries to eliminate pay inequities among our Informational, Financial and Public Resource Professionals (Unit 1). During Monday’s bargaining session, True insisted “I have all the authority in this world. … but the response right now is zero” money for raises.

Her statement came on a day of bargaining that focused on employee issues at the State Compensation and Insurance Fund (SCIF), where workers feel that managers have searched the computers of employees who are out of favor, on fishing expeditions for wrongdoing. We also exchanged a proposal to restrict computer searches and to limit the use of video surveillance cameras, at SCIF, to security investigations and not to monitor work performance.

On Tuesday, our team will focus on pay inequities and work load issues at the Employment Development Department.
 

Newly elected team ready to bargain


Updated 11:00 a.m., July 18

The Administrators of Information, Financial and Public Resources (Unit 1) bargaining team more than doubled in size with the addition of Classification Bargaining Unit Representatives (CBURs) yet they were fully prepared to bargain with the state. However, the state did nothing in preparation as both sides returned to the table yesterday.

After intense training for the newly elected CBURs, the Unit 1 team went to the table ready to do business.  “We were ready to go,” said Marie Harder, Unit 1 CBUR for Information Technology. “But it was disheartening that the state seemed only intent on checking for properly placed commas in order to delay the discussion of money.”

Unit 1 seeks equity pay for 140 classifications

Updated 3:10 p.m., June 28

Unit 1 negotiated for nearly 12 hours on Wednesday, bringing in frontline workers to testify on the consequences of not paying wages sufficient to retain skilled employees. Our negotiators presented equity proposals for 140 classifications effecting about 30,000 state workers.

State negotiators heard presentations from a wide range of workers, including those who inspect small airfields and heli-pads, and those who evaluate the needs of people who find themselves suddenly disbabled. Both job classifications face 30 percent vacancy rates.

 “It was great to have our members come in and  describe the problems that the state causes by not paying enough to recruit and retain skilled workers,” Unit 1 Chair Margarita Maldonado said. “The state is contributing to inefficiencies because you can’t fill so many open positions.”

Unit 1 also signed nine tentative agreements – all on contract guarantees carried over from the last contract. But many of our members felt disrespected by the state which has stalled on our proposals.

“The state negotiators have been rather patronizing,” said Paul Gonzalez-Coke, a member of the Unit 1 bargaining team.  “They are careful with their words. But their tone gives away their complete lack of sincerity. It is so clear that they don’t respect our work.”


Unit 1 presents career mobility training plan

Updated 5:30 p.m., June 24

Our Unit 1 team signed five tentative agreements Monday after an 11-hour bargaining session with the state. Both sides exchanged 21 total items, including 13 from Local 1000 and eight from state negotiators. Our most important proposal was a plan to provide paid release time for Unit 1 members to obtain training related to your current position or for a potential promotion. But given the state’s resistance on other Local 1000 proposals on equity, our Unit 1 team is expecting a fight on training too.


So far the state has resisted every proposal from every single unit that deals with increases in money – no matter how minor. Our Unit 1 team said the state needs to realize that training increases productivity and ultimately saves the state money.   

“Our training proposal will enhance skills and increase productivity,” said bargaining team member Paul Gonzalez-Coke. “Productivity equals results. This is win-win for the state and workers.” 

Bargaining team member Adrienne Suffin pointed out that Local 1000’s training proposal is a direct response to the priorities that members expressed in bargaining surveys this spring and in work-site Listen Up meetings. 

“Training helps people feel better about their jobs and do a better job,” Suffin said. “The potential for upward mobility is crucial to Unit 1 members.” 

Both sides are scheduled to meet again Wednesday at 9 a.m.



Unit 1 EDD “shocked” management with workload stories

Updated 11:00 a.m., June 20

Yesterday was EDD day at the table when Unit 1 resumed negotiations with the state. Local 1000 negotiators presented two major proposals, including one that would reduce Unemployment Insurance representatives’ workload and set workload standards for Disability Insurance representatives. The state and Unit 1 signed one tentative agreement dealing with Permanent Intermittent conversions.

With EDD action pictures on the wall in plain view of the state, EDD members shared stories of out-of-control workloads. “Management appeared to be shell-shocked by our workload stories,” said Angela Onorato, a UI representative in San Jose. “We put a human face on the cold hard statistics we presented.”

Unit 1 will be back at the table on Monday, June 23 and EDD will have another day at the table on Wednesday, June 25.



Unit 1 exchanges several proposals - negotiates again today

Updated 12:00 p.m., June 19

Unit 1 exchanged several economic proposals with the state yesterday, and including an increase to the out-of-state pay differentials. Our team will return to the bargaining table today to continue negotiations and will focus on out-of-control workloads at EDD.



Unit 1 signs 9 tentative agreements with state

Update 7:00 p.m. June 13

Unit 1, which represents 44,000 professional state workers, signed nine tentative agreements with the state on Friday. All nine tentative agreements carry over language and guarantees from our 2006 contract, including a provision for voluntary personal leave. In addition our team continued negotiations on professional development and career advancement.

“We’ll continue to push the state to ensure that our members have more opportunities for professional development,” Unit 1 Chair Margarita Maldonado said. “When our members filled out bargaining surveys, they told us that career development was their most important issue.”

Both sides are scheduled to meet again on Wednesday.



Unit 1 Tentative Agreements

Your contract contains numerous articles that are specific to the needs of Bargaining Unit 1 employees. During negotiations, our bargaining team reviews and approves each of those articles and reaches Tentative Agreement with the state as we work towards a fully approved contact.

Click on the links below to read and review Unit 1-specific articles that have been tentatively approved.

1.2.1 Designation of Confidential Positions
13.17.1 Independent Research/Professional Papers
5.12 Upward Mobility Joint Labor/Management Committee14.13.1 Lead Responsibilities
8.15 Personal Leave Program - Voluntary 
18.2.1 EDD PI's Conversion and Ratio
10.7 Protective Clothing   19.4 Meal Periods
10.9 Safety Equipment   19.13.1 Overtime Assignment for WWG 2...
10.19 Assaultive Behavior 21.3 Class A & Class B Commercial Driver's License
11.17 Recruitment & Retention Differentials21.6.1 Hearst Castle Night Tours
11.26.1 Arduous Duty Differential for FLSA Exempt...21.7.1 Organizational Development
12.13 Tools, Business Equipment, Materials & Supplies21.9.1 Business Cards
12.14 Professional Dues21.10.1 Incompatible Activities
12.16.1 Aviation Consultants
12.17.1 PERS Auditor Affiliation  Side Letter 6.1  EDD Tax Tools October 19, 2000
12.18.1 Professional License FeesSide Letter 11.1 The CalPERS Telework Program...
12.19.1 Actuary Dues - DOISide Letter 12.1 CalEPA Agreement dated 10/2000
13.7.1 Performance Standards Side Letter 16.1 DDS, DAPD Implementation of...
13.10 Education & Training 

























Processing the tentative agreements is time consuming. We are posting the information to the website throughout the day as quickly as possible.


Bargaining Unit Election Results

Bargaining unit 1 results



CBUR Election Results
Bringing Equity, Opportunity and Professional Development to Unit 1

CBUR Tally Sheet        CBUR Ballots Received

Administration and Analytical
Sacramento (5)
Aaron Roberson
Rene Aguilera
Ernest Feliciano
Barbara Powers
Xochitl Montano
Coastal and Central (1)
Cindy Kauffman
SE & SW (1)
Yvonne Washington
Finance
Sacramento (3)

Jacqueline McCollu
James Graston
John Leng
Coastal and Central (1)
Roderick L. Bowie
SW & SE (1)
Rita Stephenson
Employment and Health Services
Sacramento (1)

Javier G. Cardenas
Coastal (1)
Susan Rodriquez
Central (1)
Carrie Brown
S o utheast (1)
Paul Rodarte
Southwest (1)
Babbett E. Killpatrick
Information Technology

Sacramento (3)
Lesley Boren
Marie Harder
Jeffrey Recht
Outside Sacramento (1)
Rickey Frey

Environmental and Consumer Protection (2)
Lisa Flores
Claudia Gambaro
Communications and Research (2)

Neal A. Johnson
William R. Hall